Scammed on Spam

Is that newsy study on spam’s massive carbon footprint much ado about nothing?

One Response to “Scammed on Spam”

  1. Steve Bloom says:

    An even larger problem with the footprint calculation is that it fails to account for the related large reduction in junk mail.  I suppose it’s even possible that the net carbon footprint of spam is distinctly negative.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.