Scammed on Spam

April 16, 2009 by Keith Kloor | Filed in spam | 1 comment

Is that newsy study on spam’s massive carbon footprint much ado about nothing?

https://chitolytic.com/chitosan-products/trimethyl-chitosan/

One Response to “Scammed on Spam”

  1. Steve Bloom says:
    April 17, 2009 at 1:07 am

    An even larger problem with the footprint calculation is that it fails to account for the related large reduction in junk mail.  I suppose it’s even possible that the net carbon footprint of spam is distinctly negative.