Grading the Speech

The tweety and bloggy opiners who care most about climate change and energy policy were mostly left cold by President Obama’s big speech last night. Here’s an arbitrary round-up that captures the varying reax:

https://musiciselementary.com/2024/03/07/cn489rf

Order Tramadol From India MoJo’s Kevin Drum panned it. The Atlantic’s Joshua Green said it was a “decent speech, but he [Obama] wimped out on climate change.” Kate Shepard, also with MoJo, called it “disappointing” and said Obama “largely avoided the issue of climate change.” Indeed, said Bill McKibben:

https://musiciselementary.com/2024/03/07/0yg2s2i I was struck by the fact that he didn’t mention climate change, except as a reference to the title of the house bill, and that he didn’t mention carbon prices.

https://asperformance.com/uncategorized/kt79pg7

https://www.jamesramsden.com/2024/03/07/aen9ow2r5z Concludes Time’s Byran Walsh:

It may be time to bury cap-and-trade.

Yet Joe Romm gave Obama a B, and focused more on the White House talking points handed out afterward. The Oil Drum, meanwhile, played it down the middle.

So did Andy Revkin, it seems, who called the speech “workmanlike” and said:

Obama has left open the prospect of pivoting to energy and climate as a top priority in coming months, but chose (wisely) not to use a moment of national unease, built on a backdrop of unchecked pollution, as a launching pad.

https://fotballsonen.com/2024/03/07/n2albl9yu That Obama did not seize this “moment,” though, is precisely what pissed off many progressive climate watchers, so it’ll be interesting to watch the reax to Revkin on that score.

https://www.goedkoopvliegen.nl/uncategorized/jzffqehzow8 I’ll update additional responses from other notable commentators throughout the day.

https://www.worldhumorawards.org/uncategorized/zprgy7droys https://worthcompare.com/1bn5odxu UPDATE: 6/16: 10:15am: Here’s the Yeglesias header on his post: “Obama Punts on Climate.” Grist’s David Roberts, echoing Romm, is determined to accentuate the positives.

https://ncmm.org/jcivtz55o 11am: A quick and dirty scan of some mainstream media columnists also reveals an interesting spectrum. In the Washington Post, David Ignatius detected a”glimmer of leadership” in the speech, and said Obama got it just about right:

https://asperformance.com/uncategorized/sw8iaeda1hz Call to arms. Three-point plan. End our energy addiction. God bless America.

That sort of facile nothingness frustrated both John Dickerson and Danial Gross at Slate, who wrote of Obama:

while he spoke eloquently and specifically of his faith in America’s ability to innovate in the long-term””a faith I share””he was vague when it came to the specific, short-term steps the organization he runs can take. As John Dickerson notes here, there was little mention of tough, controversial, but necessary initiatives such as placing a price on carbon, or sharply raising the tax on gasoline, or instituting a cap-and-trade regime. Obama’s speech was like a PowerPoint presentation with the last few slides missing.

For its part, The WSJ, in its lead editorial, wrote that Obama

https://www.worldhumorawards.org/uncategorized/zgq3b06x naturally took the opportunity to put his moribund climate legislation back in play.

https://wasmorg.com/2024/03/07/0rafy4bg Based on the dominant assessment of most observations I’ve cited thus far, you have to wonder what speech the WSJ editorial writers were watching. Or are they just on automatic pilot over at the editorial page?

4.20:pm: Ezra Klein probably speaks for a lot of dispirited greens today, with this observation:

https://elisabethbell.com/qs1r2bx8cpd I’m just not sure how you do a response to climate change if you can’t really say the words “climate change.”

https://www.goedkoopvliegen.nl/uncategorized/xwvcc1aa86 Brad Plumer over at TNR certainly agrees and adds, for good measure:

If the president can’t make that case in a major prime-time address in the midst of the biggest environmental disaster in U.S. history, then who can?

But Roger Pielke Jr. argues that President Obama deserves credit for admitting he doesn’t have all the answers [when Obama asked for “other ideas” on how to tackle climate change and decarbonization]. Roger adds:

https://worthcompare.com/zedmzbicxh For too long “I don’t know” has been taboo in discussions of climate policy. But understanding the limits of our policy proposals is a first step toward wiser policies.

https://www.lcclub.co.uk/xiyn45f On this note, Roger’s take echoes Andy Revkin’s, whose post headline on the speech read:

Obama Seeking New Ideas on Climate and Energy

In stark contrast to the many climate watchers who have slammed the President’s speech for its timidity and half-measures on energy policy, Roger is laudatory:

http://countocram.com/2024/03/07/f4wklbk Obama showed policy leadership in his speech, which will likely have partisans upset. Nonetheless, it is policy leadership that this issue needs, not political posturing.

4:45pm: And finally, Alexandra Fenwick at CJR has an excellent roundup of the national press coverage of Obama’s speech, which is carried under this clever headline:

Buying Tramadol Online Uk All Talk and No Oil Cap Makes Barack a Dull Boy

2 Responses to “Grading the Speech”

  1. https://tankinz.com/lugj8d75 Remember back in the Bush II days when someone in the administration was quoted saying 'we create our own reality'? The WSJ does that too.

  2. […] of the catch-phrases President Obama didn’t use in his much parsed Oval Office speech on Tuesday was energy security. He did, however, make a glancing, split-second […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cheap Tramadol Cod

https://www.worldhumorawards.org/uncategorized/e9yqb4w

Tramadol Cheap Uk