Monthly Archives : April 2011

Simplifying the Climate Debate

Can we all agree on this statement from Penn State geologist Richard Alley? I think it’s important to say that the interaction between radiation and gases in the air is not red or blue. It’s not Republican or Democrat, or libertarian or anything else. It’s physics. That’s from an interview that Alley does with the…Continue Reading…

Nature Weighs in on Nisbet Report

An editorial in Nature says that Matthew Nisbet’s Climate shift report “dismantles three of the most common reasons given by those who have tried, and failed, to garner widespread support for policies to restrict greenhouse gases.” I guess they didn’t get the memo from the climate capo or the reprint over at the watchdog site. The Nature…Continue Reading…

A Cupful of Controversy

Has mountain climber and best-selling Greg Mortenson of “Three Cups of Tea” fame been exposed as a fraud by  CBS’s 60 Minutes? Or is the segment that ran this past Sunday “seriously deficient” and “lacking in basic elements of fairness, balance, perspective, insight and context,” as former Newsweek correspondent Daniel Glick

Joe Romm Breaks Media Embargo, Kneecaps Nisbet

Say one thing about Joe Romm, he understands the value of getting ahead of a story to try and influence the media narrative. He’s kinda like Mike Tyson in his prime, who would launch from his corner stool like a ball of fury as soon as the opening bell was rung and pummel his opponent…Continue Reading…

Satan is a Climate Skeptic

Well, I have no idea if that’s true. But Anthony Watts needs to stop crying crocodile tears about being called a “denier” if he’s going to put up posts like this one. Here’s the headline: Charles Manson becomes an advocate for global warming You climate skeptics get the point? What about you, Anthony?

Shale Gas & Energy Security

Over at Climate Central, I ask if the controversial Cornell study will undermine a tenuous alliance built on disparate interests.

Pre-Industrial Climate Debate Warms Up

As reported last month in Nature, Scientists have come up with new evidence in support of the controversial idea that humanity’s influence on climate began not during the industrial revolution, but thousands of years ago. Now, in a guest post at Real Climate, William Ruddiman summarizes the new evidence that will appear in an upcoming…Continue Reading…

When the Pack Overruns the Story

I don’t know about you, but I’m still getting whiplash from the write-ups of the splashy Cornell University study that concluded shale gas is probably every bit as potent a greenhouse gas as coal and oil. (I first wrote about the study here.) Let’s retrace the course of the media coverage this past week. Hang…Continue Reading…

The Geopolitics of Global Warming

In recent years, the Arctic has become a place where global warming and geopolitics intersect. Over at Frontier Earth, I check the status of this hot spot.

The Painful Truth

I’m poaching this comment from yesterday’s Dot Earth post on Randy Olson. What’s striking to me is that it comes from a graduate student enrolled in a sustainability program at a top university: I love the ‘woe is me’ and ‘shame on you’ summation. It perfectly characterizes the scope of most environmental communication. The hysterical…Continue Reading…