{"id":7458,"date":"2011-10-24T09:46:40","date_gmt":"2011-10-24T13:46:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/collideascape\/?p=7458"},"modified":"2011-10-24T09:46:40","modified_gmt":"2011-10-24T13:46:40","slug":"burning-down-the-house","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/?p=7458","title":{"rendered":"Burning Down the House"},"content":{"rendered":"

https://onemillionjourney.com/covid-19-my-eye-opener/ Michael Tobis impresses with this<\/a> nuanced explication of a sticky issue. He asks:<\/p>\n

The question is how we should be thinking about extreme events. Notably, extreme weather events, and extreme environmental events of sorts that are connected to weather and climate, such as wildfires and infestations.<\/p>\n

https://drreddyfamilydoctors.com/patient-forms/ There is a tendency for those of us who are alarmed to look at every such event, and say “See! We’ve gone too far already!”\u009d Meanwhile those who tend to be more sanguine will flip through the history books, find analogous events, and say “it was ever thus”\u009d. These claims seem like they ought to be reducible to objective questions. But there is considerable controversy within science as to how to think about them.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

After shaking the Monday blues with this classic, I encourage folks to go over there and weigh in.<\/p>\n

Valium 10Mg Buy Online