{"id":7197,"date":"2011-09-23T23:46:28","date_gmt":"2011-09-24T03:46:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/collideascape\/?p=7197"},"modified":"2011-09-23T23:46:28","modified_gmt":"2011-09-24T03:46:28","slug":"who-you-calling-anti-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/?p=7197","title":{"rendered":"Who You Calling Anti-Science?"},"content":{"rendered":"

https://disneycruisinggroup.com/marksnews/ Here’s the charge, from<\/a>\u00a0Chris Mooney:<\/p>\n

Political conservatives in the U.S. today have overwhelming problems with science. They reject, in large numbers, mainstream and accepted knowledge on fundamental things about humans and the planet”\u201cevolution, global warming, to name a few. I also\u00a0recently posted<\/a>\u00a0about how systematically conservatives undermine science with respect to reproductive health.<\/p>\n

Order Tramadol Online And this is still just the tip of the iceberg.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

https://dinoeliadis.com/recommended-reading/ Ken Green says\u00a0WTF<\/a>?<\/p>\n

http://masterfacilitator.com/teamfacilitation/ Before firing off his own rebuttal at AEI, Green counterpunched in the comments section (which I don’t see any way to link to) of Mooney’s blog. Green’s rejoinder, to my mind, has merit and is concisely and cogently made in this particular comment:<\/p>\n

https://blackhillsballoons.com/local-recommendations/ Chris’ argument is that the right is more anti-science than the left. I agree that many on the right reject science regarding evolution, and (somewhat) on climate change, both of which are bad. I’ve written about that at AEI. However, I think that the left is FAR more prone to present things as being “scientific” that are mostly pseudo-scientific nonsense, and they are very half-hearted about retracting them when they’ve propagated and caused harm.<\/p>\n

https://raceflowdevelopment.com/ordering/ Thus, if I were adding up the ledger, I’d score two “anti-science” points to the right for evolution and climate change, but about 20 “anti-science” points to the left for exaggerating the dangers of pesticides, herbicides, chemicals in general, radiation, conventional agriculture, plastics, paper, artificial sweeteners, vaccines, GM organisms, aquaculture, etc.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Order Xanax No Prescription This is a valid counter-argument. Green is essentially saying that the anti-science manifestation on the Left (masked as pseudo-science) is different than that on the Right (which is outright rejection of established science). And that the Left has more anti-science strikes against it than the Right.<\/p>\n

Order Hydrocodone Online What Green fails to address is that an anti-evolution pose and climate change rejectionism have become closely associated with the GOP, because of the influence of religious conservatives and the Tea Party. There are no similarly high profile anti-science stances associated with Democrat leaders or policymakers. For example, President Obama, as Mooney pointed out, is pro-nuclear. Here’s another: The Obama administration has made regulatory decisions on GMO foods that have upset the lefty, anti-GMO types at Grist and Mother Jones. And so on.<\/p>\n

https://dentalprovidence.com/dental-fillings/ So when looked at this way, there is no equivalence in anti-science attitudes between establishment Republicans and Democrats–as reflected in the kinds of science-related issues that are now fixtures in the political landscape. It’s pretty clear which party is getting the anti-science reputation and why.<\/p>\n

It’s also understandable that Green and other science-respecting conservatives don’t like this label, but their beef should be more with the direction the Republican party has chosen.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

https://www.balimadetour.com/about/ Here’s the charge, from\u00a0Chris Mooney: Political conservatives in the U.S. today have overwhelming problems with science. They reject, in large numbers, mainstream and accepted knowledge on fundamental things about humans and the planet”\u201cevolution, global warming, to name a few. I also\u00a0recently posted\u00a0about how systematically conservatives undermine science with respect to reproductive health. And this is… https://www.randwickpsychologycentre.com/faq/ Continue Reading…<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2915,2961],"tags":[835,1488,1581],"class_list":["post-7197","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-science","tag-climate-change","tag-politics","tag-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7197","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7197"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7197\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7197"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7197"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7197"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}