{"id":4319,"date":"2011-01-11T11:20:27","date_gmt":"2011-01-11T16:20:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/collideascape\/?p=4319"},"modified":"2011-01-11T11:20:27","modified_gmt":"2011-01-11T16:20:27","slug":"rule-1-for-climate-discourse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/?p=4319","title":{"rendered":"Rule #1 for Climate Discourse?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> 
<a href="https://www.randwickpsychologycentre.com/therapists/">https://www.randwickpsychologycentre.com/therapists/</a> A reader of James Fallows has a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/politics\/archive\/2011\/01\/a-very-good-question-what-does-civility-mean-exactly\/69290\/\" target=\"_blank\">suggestion<\/a> to better focus the national discussion of the moment that is equally relevant to the climate change debate:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> 
<a href="https://blackhillsballoons.com/contact-us/">https://blackhillsballoons.com/contact-us/</a> I would love to see a list of common sense rules (similar to Michael  Pollan&#8217;s food rules) that serve as good reminders of civil discourse.  What would you like to see on such a list? My first one, for example:  &#8220;Never speak with the insinuation that your opponents do not have the  best interest of Americans at heart.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> 
<a href="https://theroyalstagproperties.com/our-menu/">https://theroyalstagproperties.com/our-menu/</a> If only <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Joe Romm<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Anthony Watts<\/a>, two of the most popular climate bloggers that happen to occupy opposite ends of the climate spectrum, would take that advice to heart. For the record, I do believe that both of these men have the best interest of Americans at heart.<\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://forgive123.com/terms/">https://forgive123.com/terms/</a> On a somewhat related note, <a href=\"http:\/\/andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com\/the_daily_dish\/2011\/01\/the-climate.html\" target=\"_blank\">via<\/a> Andrew Sullivan, Fallows colleague at The Atlantic, I was made aware of this interesting <a href=\"http:\/\/www.themonkeycage.org\/2011\/01\/atmospheric_politics.html\" target=\"_blank\">post<\/a> that suggests &#8220;arguments about climate change&#8221; provide<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> 
<a href="https://andiroberts.com/leadership-myths/"></a> one useful way to think about the relationship between violent rhetoric  and violent action.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> 
<a href="https://dinoeliadis.com/results/">Buy Xanax Online Without Prescription</a> The climate change example discussed by the blogger &#8220;Henry&#8221; relates not to civil dialogue but to the causal connection often invoked for random weather and disaster events. He <a href=\"http:\/\/www.themonkeycage.org\/2011\/01\/atmospheric_politics.html\" target=\"_blank\">writes<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> 
<a href="https://raceflowdevelopment.com/customer-service/"></a> &#8230;it is usually going to be next to impossible to tell whether any  given event is &#8217;caused&#8217; by climate change&#8230;Testing arguments about climate change involves  multiple data points and the usual problems of statistical inference  etc.  Similarly, it is probably a bad idea to attribute any particular violent action to an overall climate of violent rhetoric <em>without<\/em> some strong evidence of a direct causal relationship.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> 
<a href="https://worklivelaos.com/img_8751/">Order Ambien Online</a> A reader of James Fallows has a suggestion to better focus the national discussion of the moment that is equally relevant to the climate change debate: I would love to see a list of common sense rules (similar to Michael Pollan&#8217;s food rules) that serve as good reminders of civil discourse. What would you like&#8230;<span> <a href="https://disneycruisinggroup.com/openingdaypricing/">https://disneycruisinggroup.com/openingdaypricing/</a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/?p=4319\">Continue Reading&#8230;<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2543,2553,2557,2561],"tags":[835,839,846],"class_list":["post-4319","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-civil-discourse","category-climate-change","category-climate-politics","category-climate-science","tag-climate-change","tag-climate-discourse","tag-climate-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4319","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4319"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4319\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4319"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}