{"id":4248,"date":"2011-01-07T11:15:27","date_gmt":"2011-01-07T16:15:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/collideascape\/?p=4248"},"modified":"2011-01-07T11:15:27","modified_gmt":"2011-01-07T16:15:27","slug":"cry-me-a-river","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/?p=4248","title":{"rendered":"Cry Me a River"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> 
<a href="http://masterfacilitator.com/belbinteamroles360/">http://masterfacilitator.com/belbinteamroles360/</a> Media bashing is a popular sport of both the Left and Right. It always has been, but in the blog\/twitter\/200 cable channels age, journalism has become a proxy battleground for everyone with an ax to grind, as this 2008 NYT <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/09\/07\/weekinreview\/07leibovich.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1&amp;fta=y\" target=\"_blank\">story<\/a> explains:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> 
<a href="https://www.andrewplimmer.com/contact/">Buy Ultram Online</a> The blur of new media creates fresh opportunities for attack,  counterattack, counter-counterattacks, odd alliances, strained  allegiances, hidden agendas and, most of all, confusion.<\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://worklivelaos.com/comic_party2/">Ambien Without Prescription</a> &#8220;People  walk up to me and start complaining about some crawl they just saw on  CNBC,&#8221;\u009d said Mr. Brokaw, referring to the business news channel owned by  his network. &#8220;And I have no idea what they&#8217;re talking about. It&#8217;s like  the &#8220;\u02dcStar Wars&#8217; bar.&#8221;\u009d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> 
<a href="https://growthjourneytherapy.com/contact/"></a> This journalist-as-punching bag craze is pronounced in the climate blogosphere. Global warming-related coverage is regularly derided at two of the most popular sites, <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2011\/01\/03\/media-coverage-fell-off-the-map-in-2010\/\" target=\"_blank\">Climate Progress<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2010\/12\/29\/time-magazine-blizzard-science-sets-low-standard-for-green-journalism\/\" target=\"_blank\">What&#8217;s Up With That<\/a>. Their faithful readerships eat it up, despite the criticism being selective, one-sided, and way out of proportion to the voluminous reportage and commentary produced daily on an array of sites, from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/environment\" target=\"_blank\">The Guardian<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.grist.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Grist<\/a> to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/earth-and-environment\" target=\"_blank\">Scientific American<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/green.blogs.nytimes.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">The New York Times<\/a>. (See Tom Yulsman&#8217;s recent <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cejournal.net\/?p=4815\" target=\"_blank\">post<\/a> for more perspective on this.)<\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://theroyalstagproperties.com/home-video/">https://theroyalstagproperties.com/home-video/</a> Journalists working the climate\/environment beat mostly shrug off the arrows slung at them from all sides, which is a wise thing to do. Criticism comes with the territory, be it city hall or the EPA.<\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://rgprincipal.com/equipo-chile/">https://rgprincipal.com/equipo-chile/</a> But sometimes pushback is necessary. So I was happy to see Andrew Revkin stick up for his profession in a recent <a href=\"http:\/\/dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com\/2011\/01\/05\/climate-news-snooze\/\" target=\"_blank\">post<\/a>, specifically taking aim at this <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2011\/01\/03\/media-coverage-fell-off-the-map-in-2010\/\" target=\"_blank\">skewed criticism<\/a> by Joe Romm.<\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://andiroberts.com/resourcehub/">Order Ambien Online</a> Revkin writes:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> 
<a href="https://castlehomecomfort.com/drain-cleaning/">Buy Valium 10 Mg Online</a> I&#8217;m trying not to use Dot Earth as a reactive tool, but once in awhile  I&#8217;ve got to defend my newsroom colleagues.\u00a0While climate pundits sit  inside the Beltway dictating posts, Justin Gillis has been traveling to  mountain peaks and ice sheets to tell the story of <a href=\"http:\/\/topics.nytimes.com\/top\/reference\/timestopics\/people\/g\/justin_gillis\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\">accumulating carbon dioxide and diminishing glacial ice.<\/a> The reporters who produced this year&#8217;s outstanding &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/12\/25\/science\/earth\/25fossil.html\" target=\"_blank\">Beyond Fossil Fuels<\/a>&#8221; series traveled the globe, as well, building on years of prior coverage that first crested with our multi-year <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/ref\/science\/earth\/energy.html\" target=\"_blank\">Energy Challenge series<\/a>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> 
<a href="https://dentalprovidence.com/career/">Get Online Xanax Prescription</a> Of course, climate pundits aren&#8217;t the only ones taking potshots at the media. Climate scientists and climate educators are increasingly venting their displeasure with journalists, as well. The latest example is at Real Climate, which <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2011\/01\/forbes-rich-list-of-nonsense\/\" target=\"_blank\">deconstructs<\/a> this Forbes <a href=\"http:\/\/www.forbes.com\/2010\/12\/23\/media-climate-change-warming-opinions-contributors-larry-bell_print.html\" target=\"_blank\">article<\/a>. But towards the end of its legitimate criticism of the Forbes piece, the authors lob this stinkbomb at the media:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> 
<a href="https://forgive123.com/elementor-8916/">Buy Lyrica Without Prescription</a> The naysayers ought to be thrilled at the lack of interest in climate  change shown in the press, at least in North America. The longer we  delay, the bigger the topic gets, and the more ridiculous the refusal of  the press and policy sector to grapple with it becomes.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> 
<a href="https://alpineinterface.com/canadian-rockies-classic/">https://alpineinterface.com/canadian-rockies-classic/</a> So when the press isn&#8217;t &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2011\/01\/05\/science-based-dire-warnings-are-an-essential-part-of-good-climate-messaging\/\" target=\"_blank\">blowing the story<\/a>,&#8221; it&#8217;s ignoring it, right? Got it.<\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://disneycruisinggroup.com/releases/">Order Clonazepam Online</a> In fairness to the folks at RC, they will <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2010\/12\/post-holiday-round-up\/\" target=\"_blank\">laud<\/a> outstanding climate journalism from time to time, unlike Romm, who only <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2010\/07\/29\/how-the-status-quo-media-failed-on-climate-change\/\" target=\"_blank\">emphasizes<\/a> the <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2010\/12\/21\/and-the-2010-citizen-kane-award-for-non-excellence-in-climate-journalism-goes-to-\"\u00a6\/\" target=\"_blank\">negative<\/a>, to the <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2010\/12\/21\/and-the-2010-citizen-kane-award-for-non-excellence-in-climate-journalism-goes-to-\"\u00a6\/#comment-314226\" target=\"_blank\">rare chagrin<\/a> (comment #31) of his readers.<\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://forgive123.com/about/"></a> Charges of <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2011\/01\/03\/media-coverage-fell-off-the-map-in-2010\/\" target=\"_blank\">silence<\/a> aside, critics such as Romm reflexively highlight only the stories they dislike, giving the impression that environmental and climate journalists &#8220;blow the story&#8221; every single time they publish. That recently prompted Yulsman to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cejournal.net\/?p=4757\" target=\"_blank\">ask<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> 
<a href="https://disneycruisinggroup.com/transportation/">Ambien Buy Without Prescription</a> Are we really that awful?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> 
<a href="https://worklivelaos.com/old_morning_market/"></a> No, of course not. Rather, as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanprogress.org\/aboutus\/staff\/JohnsonBrad.html\" target=\"_blank\">Brad Johnson<\/a>, Romm&#8217;s colleague at the Center for American Progress, <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2010\/12\/21\/and-the-2010-citizen-kane-award-for-non-excellence-in-climate-journalism-goes-to-\"\u00a6\/#comment-314054\" target=\"_blank\">asserts<\/a> (in comment #3), Yulsman is part of an<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> 
<a href="https://theroyalstagproperties.com/area-attractions/">https://theroyalstagproperties.com/area-attractions/</a> enviro-journalist cabal that have complicated reasons for muddying the  science, that reflect decades of being manipulated by propagandists.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> 
<a href="https://growthjourneytherapy.com/methods/">https://growthjourneytherapy.com/methods/</a> Or maybe he didn&#8217;t mean Yulsman, just everyone else who covers climate change. I don&#8217;t know. Brad never responded when I <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2010\/12\/21\/and-the-2010-citizen-kane-award-for-non-excellence-in-climate-journalism-goes-to-\"\u00a6\/#comment-314110\" target=\"_blank\">asked<\/a> him (comment #17) at the &#8220;Star Wars&#8221; bar for specifics.<\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://dentalprovidence.com/crowns/">https://dentalprovidence.com/crowns/</a> Regardless, you get the picture. Journalists exhibit &#8220;a lack of interest in climate  change&#8221; when they aren&#8217;t &#8220;blowing the story&#8221; because of their membership in a &#8220;cabal&#8221; that has been &#8220;manipulated by propagandists&#8221; for decades.<\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://www.andrewplimmer.com/andrew-plimmer/">https://www.andrewplimmer.com/andrew-plimmer/</a> Yep, makes sense to me.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> 
<a href="https://forgive123.com/terms/">https://forgive123.com/terms/</a> Media bashing is a popular sport of both the Left and Right. It always has been, but in the blog\/twitter\/200 cable channels age, journalism has become a proxy battleground for everyone with an ax to grind, as this 2008 NYT story explains: The blur of new media creates fresh opportunities for attack, counterattack, counter-counterattacks, odd&#8230;<span> <a href="https://castlehomecomfort.com/plumbing-maintenance/">Purchase Ambien Online</a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/?p=4248\">Continue Reading&#8230;<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2553,2790],"tags":[835,1250],"class_list":["post-4248","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-climate-change","category-journalism","tag-climate-change","tag-journalism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4248","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4248"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4248\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4248"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4248"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4248"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}