{"id":14665,"date":"2015-03-21T07:15:15","date_gmt":"2015-03-21T11:15:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/collideascape\/?p=14665"},"modified":"2015-03-21T07:15:15","modified_gmt":"2015-03-21T11:15:15","slug":"frankenjournalism-at-msnbc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/?p=14665","title":{"rendered":"Frankenjournalism at MSNBC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Two years ago, a\u00a0bill<\/a>\u00a0to label foods that contained genetically engineered ingredients was introduced into Congress by a Democratic representative from Oregon and a Democratic senator <\/a>from California. It didn’t go anywhere, and we haven’t heard much about it, though since then proposed mandatory GMO labeling laws<\/a> in some states have been in the news<\/a>. As Nathanael Johnson wrote<\/a> in Grist<\/em> last year, these initiatives draw media interest, which often helps to educate consumers that are mostly clueless about GMOs:<\/p>\n

https://forgive123.com/travel/ When veteran health and environmental reporters dig into the GMO debate, they start showing people what all the most trustworthy scientific and medical institutions have found: This technology is no riskier than other cherished new technologies we constantly introduce into our lives.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Ambien Buy Without Prescription Such responsible journalism was nowhere to be seen in a seven minute MSNBC segment\u00a0that aired last month:<\/p>\n

https://dinoeliadis.com/schedule-time/