{"id":12720,"date":"2014-02-24T14:54:52","date_gmt":"2014-02-24T19:54:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/collideascape\/?p=12720"},"modified":"2014-02-24T14:54:52","modified_gmt":"2014-02-24T19:54:52","slug":"david-rose-award-gmo-reporting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/?p=12720","title":{"rendered":"The David Rose Award For GMO Reporting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> 
<a href="https://ramedicare.com/modified-power-yoga-routine/">https://ramedicare.com/modified-power-yoga-routine/</a> The fundamentally <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cjr.org\/the_observatory\/calling_out_the_climate_conspi.php?page=all&amp;print=true\" target=\"_blank\">flawed and distorted climate reporting<\/a> by David Rose in the UK&#8217;s <em>Daily Mail<\/em> is often called out by science journalists and bloggers. His repeated misrepresentation of climate scientists has prompted the UK&#8217;s Met office to publicly <a href=\"http:\/\/metofficenews.wordpress.com\/tag\/david-rose\/\" target=\"_blank\">respond on numerous occasions<\/a>. It&#8217;s unfortunate that one reporter continues to flout basic journalistic principles on an important scientific issue, but at least he does not go unchallenged.<\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://andiroberts.com/emotional-intelligence/"></a> The same cannot be said for John Vidal, the <em>Guardian&#8217;s<\/em> environment editor, who is the David Rose of GMO reporting. Vidal&#8217;s coverage of genetically modified (GM) crops is not as outlandish as Rose&#8217;s climate coverage, but it is just as slanted. Both have an obvious bias that colors their articles.<\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://dinoeliadis.com/press-releases/"></a> For example, look at Vidal&#8217;s 2012\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/2012\/sep\/28\/study-gm-maize-cancer\" target=\"_blank\">story<\/a> on the discredited rat tumor\u00a0study by\u00a0Gilles-Eric S\u00e9ralini. Respectable science journalists <a href=\"http:\/\/ksj.mit.edu\/tracker\/2012\/09\/rancid-corrupt-way-report-about-science\" target=\"_blank\">blanched at the circumstances<\/a> surrounding the study and examined it critically. Vidal, on the other hand, went out of his way\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/2012\/sep\/28\/study-gm-maize-cancer\" target=\"_blank\">to take it seriously<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://www.balimadetour.com/contact-us/">https://www.balimadetour.com/contact-us/</a> Last year, Vidal <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/global-development\/2013\/feb\/16\/india-rice-farmers-revolution\" target=\"_blank\">reported<\/a>\u00a0on an Indian village where farmers were supposedly producing record crop yields without herbicides and GM technology. One of the soil scientists quoted by Vidal wrote an <a href=\"http:\/\/irri.org\/blogs\/item\/another-new-rice-yield-record-let-s-move-beyond-it\" target=\"_blank\">interesting commentary<\/a> on the piece, including this bit:<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p> 
<a href="https://dentalprovidence.com/crowns/">https://dentalprovidence.com/crowns/</a> I was quoted with a personal statement in The Guardian article (and re-quoted subsequently by many other outlets). Interestingly, I have never spoken with Mr. Vidal. Instead, the words ascribed to me in his article appear to have been extracted from a phone interview I gave to World Bank staff in 2008, which you can find\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/info.worldbank.org\/etools\/docs\/library\/245848\/topic04\/viewpoints.html\">here<\/a>. You will notice that I spoke at great length about SRI (for about 10 minutes), explaining a lot more than what was quoted by Mr. Vidal and others. Journalistic standards should be followed. It would have been nice to see at least a reference to the full interview or to talk with me in person.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> 
<a href="https://plazadelencuentro.com/quem-somos/">https://plazadelencuentro.com/quem-somos/</a> Perhaps Vidal needs a refresher on proper attribution. He might want to sit in on <em>Guardian<\/em> colleague James Randerson&#8217;s science <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/guardian-masterclasses\/science-journalism-james-randerson1\" target=\"_blank\">journalism class<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://theroyalstagproperties.com/contact-5/"></a> When Vidal wants to fully air his anti-GMO opinions he uses a soapbox at Guardian&#8217;s\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/global-development\/poverty-matters\/2010\/sep\/29\/gates-foundation-gm-monsanto\" target=\"_blank\">Poverty Matters<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/global-development\/2014\/feb\/24\/gm-crops-european-scientists-africa-promote-biotech\" target=\"_blank\">Global Development<\/a>\u00a0blog sites. His latest offering at the latter is a marvel, for reasons Robert Wilson concisely <a href=\"http:\/\/carboncounter.wordpress.com\/2014\/02\/24\/is-the-royal-society-monsanto\/\" target=\"_blank\">explains<\/a> at his blog, Carbon Counter.<\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://blackhillsballoons.com/team/">Ambien No Prescription</a> There is also this odd statement from Vidal in his <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/global-development\/2014\/feb\/24\/gm-crops-european-scientists-africa-promote-biotech\" target=\"_blank\">piece<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> 
<a href="https://blackhillsballoons.com/available-activities/"></a> The talks take place as industry data shows the planting of GM crops has practically halted in the US&#8230;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> 
<a href="https://forgive123.com/contact/"></a> That prompted this puzzled tweet from Benjamin Edge:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" lang=\"en\" data-conversation=\"none\"><p> 
<a href="https://www.secpeinvestments.com/contact/"></a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/keithkloor\">@keithkloor<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/guardian\">@guardian<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/john_vidal\">@john_vidal<\/a> How does 70.1m hectares = the planting of GM crops has practically halted in the US <a href=\"http:\/\/t.co\/Rx8A6oPGD4\">http:\/\/t.co\/Rx8A6oPGD4<\/a><\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://castlehomecomfort.com/employment/">https://castlehomecomfort.com/employment/</a> \u2014 Benjamin Edge (@edgeben) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/edgeben\/statuses\/437935201566851072\">February 24, 2014<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> 
<a href="https://dinoeliadis.com/about-us/"></a> The sentence was soon changed&#8211;without any formal correction&#8211;to read (my bold):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> 
<a href="https://disneycruisinggroup.com/hotels/">Buy Ultram Online</a> The talks take place as industry data shows the <strong> <a href="http://masterfacilitator.com/facilitationphysicalenvironment/">Buy Valium Online Without Prescription</a> increade<\/strong> in the planting of GM crops has practically halted in the US&#8230;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> 
<a href="https://castlehomecomfort.com/about-us/">Order Hydrocodone Online</a> Let&#8217;s presume there is a typo and that the correct word is increase. This is a bit more accurate, even if the sentence is awkwardly constructed. Still, there is the matter of context, as Andrew Kniss points out:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" lang=\"en\" data-conversation=\"none\"><p> 
<a href="https://andiroberts.com/resourcehub/">Order Ambien Online</a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/edgeben\">@edgeben<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/keithkloor\">@keithkloor<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/guardian\">@guardian<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/john_vidal\">@john_vidal<\/a> Of course the increase &#8220;practically halted.&#8221; GM corn, cotton, soy reached 90% of acres in US.<\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://theroyalstagproperties.com/our-menu/">Buy Alprazolam No Prescription</a> \u2014 Andrew Kniss (@WyoWeeds) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/WyoWeeds\/statuses\/437987181173284864\">February 24, 2014<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> 
<a href="http://masterfacilitator.com/belbinteamroles360/">Buy Ativan Online Without Prescription</a> In 2010, George Monbiot <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/georgemonbiot\/2010\/dec\/08\/david-rose-climate-science\" target=\"_blank\">wrote<\/a> in the<em> Guardian<\/em>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> 
<a href="https://growthjourneytherapy.com/mission/">https://growthjourneytherapy.com/mission/</a> The only hope journalists have of retaining any kind of self-respect is to question themselves repeatedly, ask whether they are being manipulated and whether they are seeing the whole story.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> 
<a href="https://dentalprovidence.com/implants/">https://dentalprovidence.com/implants/</a> He was referring to David Rose. But it could just as easily apply to John Vidal for the way he reports and writes on GMOs.<\/p>\n<p> 
<a href="https://rgprincipal.com/contact-colombia/"></a> *The headline of this post marks the creation of a new award. Send in your nominees when you come across an egregiously reported story in the mainstream media pertaining to GMOs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> 
<a href="https://dinoeliadis.com/fractional-coo-service/">Zolpidem 5Mg Order Online</a> The fundamentally flawed and distorted climate reporting by David Rose in the UK&#8217;s Daily Mail is often called out by science journalists and bloggers. His repeated misrepresentation of climate scientists has prompted the UK&#8217;s Met office to publicly respond on numerous occasions. It&#8217;s unfortunate that one reporter continues to flout basic journalistic principles on an&#8230;<span> <a href="https://www.secpeinvestments.com/cameroon-investment/"></a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/?p=12720\">Continue Reading&#8230;<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2443,2496,2724,2964],"tags":[743,918,1126,1239,1585],"class_list":["post-12720","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-agriculture","category-biotechnology","category-gmos","category-science-journalism","tag-biotechnology","tag-david-rose","tag-gmos","tag-john-vidal","tag-science-journalism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12720"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12720\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.keithkloor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}