3 Responses to “Elevating the Debate”

1. Steve Bloom says:

   April 17, 2009 at 12:06 am

   The new science sure is fascinating, but the discussion is old hat.  It’s interesting that Andy felt he had to resort to such an idiotic straw-man question to get the responses.

   What was the point of the completely irrelevant slam on Romm?      

     

2. Keith Kloor says:

   April 17, 2009 at 12:24 am

   I’d call that more a jab, not a slam. I’ve already done the latter numerous times, which you’ve take issue with, so I’m surprised you can’t tell the difference.

   As for the meaning of it, I thought that was pretty evident.

3. Steve Bloom says:

   April 17, 2009 at 6:02 am

   My question, which you did not answer, was what was the point given its complete irrelevance to the content of the post.