WSJ Plays up Peak Oil
Actually, this editorial appears in the Journal’s Europe edition. I can’t imagine it appearing in the U.S. edition, especially with this kicker:
Some dubious emails and slightly dodgy dossiers have cast a new, and unflattering, light on the global-warming debate, raising the risk of a return to the belief that we can go on consuming oil with impunity. Being a “climate-change denier” is in danger of becoming almost fashionable. But whatever the risk to the climate, scarce and expensive oil would be a threat to established economies.
We need alternatives.
Here’s the best part: the author is WSJ Europe’s editor-in-chief. Ah, the Tale of Two Journals surely will continue…
[…] Collide-a-scape » Blog Archive » Collide-a-scape >> WSJ Plays up … […]
[…] Collide-a-scape » Blog Archive » Collide-a-scape >> WSJ Plays up … […]
I understand that Hubberts peak is true and that we are now past the point of peak oil. I think many of the current events have to do with this understanding and it won’t be long before the main stream media and population wake up and understand what is going on. For me and my family, we are preparing for the life after the crash.