Elevating the Debate

There’s a mind-bending exchange between climate scientists and policy experts on Dot Earth that many should find fascinating.

https://www.jamesramsden.com/2024/03/07/bmfsi3vkyur

https://ncmm.org/nn0dkjqju Or not.

https://www.mominleggings.com/1qkpxwjs

3 Responses to “Elevating the Debate”

  1. Steve Bloom says:

    https://www.mominleggings.com/3ur5gk1ab The new science sure is fascinating, but the discussion is old hat.  It’s interesting that Andy felt he had to resort to such an idiotic straw-man question to get the responses.

    https://wasmorg.com/2024/03/07/sd9m0lizxa3

    https://musiciselementary.com/2024/03/07/ra6ecd2c233 What was the point of the completely irrelevant slam on Romm?      

    https://worthcompare.com/erelv3g6oo   

    https://giannifava.org/1ha0n3kas
  2. http://countocram.com/2024/03/07/1c50en9nr45 I’d call that more a jab, not a slam. I’ve already done the latter numerous times, which you’ve take issue with, so I’m surprised you can’t tell the difference.

    https://tankinz.com/t6is9v7na5

    https://fotballsonen.com/2024/03/07/hw7l5w8vj As for the meaning of it, I thought that was pretty evident.

    https://asperformance.com/uncategorized/lr426e9f4
  3. Steve Bloom Tramadol Online Europe says:

    https://giannifava.org/nyd2g0zdku My question, which you did not answer, was what was the point given its complete irrelevance to the content of the post. 

    http://countocram.com/2024/03/07/cokycks4